The World's Most Successful Brainwashing

– Selling Sodomy

© O. R. Adams Jr. 2011

(BACK TO ARTICLES)

The debate is truly a social-ethical-moral conceptual war that transcends both the scientific and legal, though science and law most often are the weapons of choice. The ammunition for these weapons, however, is persuasion. (Selling Homosexuality to America, by Paul E. Rondeau, Regent University Law Review, Vol. 14, No. 2, Spring, 2002)[1]

By "brainwashing," as used in this article, I mean the common definition:

Mind control (also known as brainwashing, coercive persuasion, mind abuse, thought control, or thought reform) refers to a process in which a group or individual "systematically uses unethically manipulative methods to persuade others to conform to the wishes of the manipulator(s), often to the detriment of the person being manipulated."[2]

There are probably many who think of Hitler's brainwashing of the people of Germany as a great mind control feat, but it was indeed miniscule when compared to the success in selling sodomy to the people of America, Canada, and other countries around the world. The success in America is particularly amazing considering the fact that America grew up as such a strong Christian country. Our Christian ideals, and strong American traditions of freedom and morality, helped us become the strongest country in the world – both commercially and militarily. We are now losing both our freedom and our morality, because of incessant brainwashing in a number of critical areas of our thinking. A large number of the people in the world have now been convinced that sodomy is not only acceptable, but is commendable, and should not be "discriminated" against. It appears that our President, Barrack Hussein Obama, and all of our liberal politicians, have been firmly convinced of the righteousness of sodomy.

When I use the word "sodomy" in this article, I am referring to sexual acts between people of the same sex. Research shows that the most common of these sexual acts by men are the following:

100% of male homosexuals engaged in oral sex. Approximately 93% engage in anal sex, inserting the penis into the anus of the partner. 92% engage in "rimming", touching the anus of one's partner with one's tongue and inserting the tongue into the anus. 47% engage in "fisting", inserting one's fist into the anus of the partner. 29% engage in "golden showers", urinating on each other. 17% engage in "scat", the eating of feces, or rubbing of feces on each other, and in "mud rolling", rolling on the floor where feces have been deposited. It is not uncommon for a homosexual person to declaw and defang a mouse or other rodent to be inserted into the colon.[3]

The same authorities show that sexual acts by homosexual women (lesbians) are similar. Were they not so sick and vile, some of the acts by women would be downright comical, with their harnesses and dildos.

Each and every one of the above related acts are unnatural, sick and depraved, but such acts are far from all of the things common to homosexuals that have made homosexuality so condemned over the ages by Western culture. Sex in public and public sexual displays, pedophilia, and many forms of violence are common to the homosexual lifestyle.[4]

What homosexuals do to get their classification is the last thing they want brought before the public. They want us to think in the abstract about "equal rights" and that there should be no condemnation based on what they do. “THE OVERHAULING OF STRAIGHT AMERICA – WAGING PEACE – PART TWO,” by Marshall K. Kirk and Erastes Pill, Guide Magazine, November 1987, a large part of which was reprinted in The Colorado Model, Colorado for Family Values, 1993, pages 5-11 to 5-19, states:

And when we say TALK about homosexuality, we mean just that. In the early stages of any campaign to reach straight America, the masses should not be shocked and repelled by premature exposure to homosexual behavior itself.  Instead, the imagery of sex should be downplayed and gay rights should be reduced to an abstract social question as much as possible. First let the camel get his nose inside the tent -- and only later his unsightly derriere!

The above was an important part of their "war" plans, written by two homosexuals in a homosexual magazine.

Barrack Hussein Obama, who I consider the worst President with which this country was ever plagued, with the help of the Democrat congress, which is the further to the left of the political spectrum than any we have ever had, will now burden our military forces with the acceptance of openly practicing homosexuals. Not only will our military men and women have to put up with the close association with people who openly engage in the depraved acts described above, but they will be subjected to many more sexual assaults by homosexuals. Open homosexuals in the military will also put our service men and women in danger of contracting the deadly HIV virus, and resulting AIDS. To condition them, they will undergo brainwashing to teach them that there is nothing wrong with engaging in sodomy, as has already been done in our governmental agencies, and in our colleges, universities, and schools. More details on all of this is included in the article on this website, A President Who Promotes Sodomy.[5]

Even worse, there are many in America who have caved in to the homosexual agenda to the extent that they support blessing sodomy with the holy sacrament of marriage. This includes our president and vice-president, and a number of judges and state legislatures.

Our most conservative national news organization, Fox News, including the hosts of its shows, has caved in to the homosexual agenda. It did not oppose sodomizing our military forces, and it does not oppose homosexual marriage. Many of those who have been considered conservative Republicans, and conservative organizations such as the Heritage Foundation, have caved in to the agenda. Although Rush Limbaugh occasionally overcomes his fear of the homosexualists, and says things against the agenda, including open homosexuals in the military, it sometimes appears that even he has great fear of the powerful homosexual juggernaut. He often uses the word "homophobic" invented by activist homosexuals to intimidate those who do not believe in sodomy. He has often said, I am no "homophobe." And for good reason. Many people have had their careers ruined by opposing the homosexual agenda. The first big name to fall was Anita Bryant, the singer and Christian advocate. She fought the homosexual agenda in the early days, and as a result lost her orange juice advertising contracts, and had singing engagements canceled. The Gay Lesbian, Transgender and Queer group is very proud of their damage to her career, as well as their work in getting Rush Limbaugh's orange juice advertising canceled.[6] Dr. Laura Schlessinger was a well known victim of the homosexual onslaught against anyone who dared to disagree with the righteousness of sodomy. Her advertising clientele and radio stations carrying her talk show were successfully attacked, and her move to television was successfully blocked. The homosexualists take great pride in this success.[7] They even had a special website to attack her.[8] And the attacks were vicious and affective. It is a tremendous propaganda asset when this kind of control can be gained over the media, and big corporations that advertise with them. When the truth about homosexuality is shut off, and only things that falsely appear to be positive are brought before the public, the indoctrination is largely accomplished.

Movies were made promoting the "normalcy" of homosexuality. And other movies were "coded" to make the public feel that homosexuality was commonplace and normal.[9]

Every effective means of thought control imaginable has been effectively used to make the public believe that there is nothing really wrong with the vile and depraved acts of sodomy.[10] Fifty years ago, Judeo-Christian morality in this country was sufficiently prevalent that the unheard of success of this brainwashing could not have been imagined

To fully realize the enormous changes in attitude on homosexuality, which is synonymous with sodomy, we need only review some history. Sodomy has been generally condemned since early Biblical times. According to my research, next to murder, it is the most condemned sin in the Bible.[11] Throughout the history of Western Civilization it was not only considered a very sinful perversion, but it was condemned by law, at times with the penalty of death.

Fifty years ago, homosexuals were not allowed in the Federal Bureau of Investigation (F.B.I.), the Intelligence Division of the United States Treasury Department, and many other governmental agencies; as well as many private professional and business positions; that required good moral character. Engaging in sodomy is certainly contrary to good moral character.

When the United States became a country, it was a common law crime in all thirteen states, and a crime by statute in most of them. The most renowned scholar on English Law, and particularly the Common Law, was Sir William Blackstone. His Commentaries on the Common Law are still referred to today in our court cases. His explanation on the crime of sodomy is interesting. In a concurring opinion in the United States Supreme Court case of Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 US 186 (1986), upholding a Georgia statute making sodomy a crime, Chief Justice Warren Burger noted:

Condemnation of those practices is firmly rooted in Judeao-Christian moral and ethical standards.  Homosexual sodomy was a capital crime under Roman law. See Cod Theod 9.7.6; Code  Just 9.9.31. See also D. Bailey, Homosexuality and the Western Christian Tradition 70-71 (1975). During the English Reformation when powers of the ecclesiastical courts were transferred to the King's Courts, the first English statue criminalizing sodomy was passed. 25 Hen VIII, ch 6. Blackstone described "the infamous crime against nature" as an offense of "deeper malignity" than rape, a heinous act "the very mention of which is a disgrace to human nature," and "a crime not fit to be named." 4 W. Blackstone, Commentaries *215. The common law of England, including its prohibition of sodomy, became the received law of Georgia and the other Colonies.

The majority opinion in Bowers v. Hardwick by Justice White notes:

Sodomy was a criminal offense at common law and was forbidden by the laws of the original 13 States when they ratified the Bill of Rights. In 1868, when the Fourteenth Amendment was ratified, all but 5 of the 37 States in the Union had criminal sodomy laws. In fact, until 1961, all 50 States outlawed sodomy ... .

This was a 5 to 4 decision. Already, four of our Supreme Court Judges had been corrupted by homosexual liberalism to the extent that they would have knowingly and falsely held that there was a constitutional right to engage in sodomy.

Fifty years ago, the filthy and depraved acts of sodomy were a crime in all fifty states. So how did it happen that in just fifty years, the minds of so many people in the country were changed to the extent that engaging in sodomy is considered a constitutional right, and in some states, it is blessed with the sacrament of marriage? How such brainwashing could occur is an interesting story. All conceivable methods were used – some were coercion; fear; intimidation; propaganda; use of all of the media; academia; and indoctrination in colleges and universities, schools, governmental agencies, our armed forces, corporations, and professional organizations. However, the people, and particularly the educated ones, had to be conditioned. It takes some doing to overthrow basic Judeo-Christian values in just fifty years. The conditioning was primarily the acceptance of the false teachings of modern Darwinism; and the influence of Alfred Kinsey and his homosexualist cohorts, in their pseudo science and false teachings on sexuality, that became the sexuality bible of academia. These helped bring about the "sexual revolution" of the 1960s, along with all of the other liberal decadence of that period. And it has continued until today. This is covered in more detail in the article on this website, Charles Darwin and Alfred Kinsey -- Destroyers of Judeo Christian Morality.[12]

"War" plans were written by activist homosexuals, setting out their extensive and detailed plans for the normalizing and acceptance of homosexuality. Information on specific plans are set out in Rondeau's Selling Homosexuality to America, and in great detail in various parts of As We Sodomize America,[13] written by this author, O. R. Adams Jr. But before the planned brainwashing, there was another problem that needed to be overcome. Ever since there had been psychology and psychiatry, homosexuality was recognized as a pathological mental disorder. The homosexualists needed to get this changed by the scientific community, and to have homosexuality declared to be normal and just another human trait like being left or right handed, or the different colors of one's eyes. This was quite a chore, considering that being left or right handed, or the color of one's eyes, did not involve deviant sexual behavior that was the essence of homosexuality. However, like many other modern liberal programs, facts and truth are irrelevant. Convincing the right people is all that counts, and any method is acceptable. The homosexual activists set out to get the two APAs (American Psychiatric Association and American Psychological Association) to change their classifications of homosexuality from a pathological mental disorder to a declaration that it was a normal and acceptable trait. Every conceivable means was used, including violence, but mainly incessant coercion and propaganda. Finally the homosexual campaign was successful and the changes were made in the 1970s. It was not done by scientific research and general acceptance on the basis of such studies, but by a political vote, and the vote itself was quite suspect, because it was not by a majority of the members. But the coercion in that direction even continues today. Pedophilia is closely connected with homosexuality, much more so than with heterosexuality, and the push is on to also normalize pedophilia – particularly man/boy sex. Much of this is covered in summary form in Selling Homosexuality to America, and in detail in As We Sodomize America.[14] With this enormous feat of deceit accomplished, they were now ready for their plan to indoctrinate America in general. They proceeded with their war plans.

Other branches of science were also corrupted. Studies were done and published purporting to show that homosexuality was genetic, or inherited, rather than acquired. Many of these were outright fakes, and no valid research has ever shown that homosexuality is inherited. This is covered in detail in the chapter, Causes of and Cures for Homosexuality, in As We Sodomize America. This is true as of now.  There is no general agreement on what causes homosexuality, but the preponderance of evidence is that it is acquired. This is consistent with the fact that many homosexuals were themselves sexually abused when they were young by homosexuals. Also, there are a number of ex-homosexuals who have changed their orientation, and led successful heterosexual lives. It is well established that there are ex-homosexuals, but I have never heard of an ex-black or an ex-white. Also, it should make little difference if homosexuality were inherited. Many physical and mental defects are inherited. That does not mean that they are acceptable conditions and should not be treated. Insanity is often inherited, and murders have been committed because of inherited insanity. That does not mean that those murders are acceptable. Also, if homosexuality is inherited, then surely the mental defect of pedophilia is inherited. From my studies, it appears that it is easier to cure homosexuality than pedophilia. The propaganda that homosexuality is inherited, rather than acquired, is for the purpose of creating a "victim" status, for use in the "civil rights" agenda. One thing is certain, and that is that there is no inherited trait that compels a person to engage in the filthy and depraved acts that constitute sodomy, and by which homosexuals get their classification. Outside of rape, any sexual act is voluntary.

Many addictions are acquired, and can be severe and very difficult to cure. Some are alcoholism, gambling, and drug addiction. None of these are inherited, although there are studies indicating that tendencies or weaknesses toward the development of alcoholism can be hereditary. Nevertheless, alcoholism is not considered acceptable, and certainly not commendable. But then people haven't been brainwashed into the acceptance of any of these other addictions, as they have something worse, which is sodomy.

As explained by Landeau, one method of propaganda is to claim that famous historical figures were homosexual, particularly when they are dead and cannot defend themselves or bring actions for libel and slander. This associates homosexuals with positive images (symbols) just like advertisers use celebrity endorsements. The activist homosexuals have falsely claimed a great number of famous historical people were homosexuals. A few of the more prominent ones were Jesus Christ, the Apostle Paul, King David, George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, and J. Edgar Hoover (head of the F.B.I. for many years).[15] For more detail on the falsity of the allegations about Hoover, see the online book, The Real J. Edgar Hoover: For the Record, by Ray Wannall.[16]

Some of the coercion and intimidation that took place was reminiscent of Hitler's Nazi tactics. Dr. Judith Reisman, in some of her writings has pointed out a number of similarities.[17] It seems that some of the activists intentionally adopted the Nazi pattern. In the book on this website, As We Sodomize America, I also go into it in some detail.

A Presbyterian pastor in San Francisco, Chuck McIlhenny, wrote of the things that were done to him, his family and his church, in the book, When the Wicked Seize a City.[18] He had spoken out against sodomy and opposed the homosexual movement. Homosexuals threw rocks, beer bottles, and beer cans through the church windows on many occasions. They carved swastikas in the church doors and drew them on McIlhenny's house next door. A window in their car was smashed.  Homosexuals sprayed graffiti all over the church, house, and sidewalk.  Anti-Christian, pro-homosexual leaflets were scattered around the neighborhood calling the McIlhennys Nazis, anti-gay, etc. Demonstrators often came in and disrupted Sunday worship services, vocally and by writing protests in the hymn books. They made death threats against the family. They made phone calls to them at all times of the night and day, screaming obscenities. Sometimes callers described their children by name, where they attended school, and when they got out of school. Homosexuals described the sexually deviant behavior they would practice on the children before killing them. At least three times the death threats became so severe that the McIlhennys flew their children down to Los Angeles to stay with relatives. The threats to kill were not idle threats. They set the parsonage on fire while the family was in it. Although this was clearly a serious felony, and possibly attempted murder, no one was ever prosecuted.[19]

Churches and ministers around the country were subjected to the same kind of mistreatment, although it was not generally as violent as in San Francisco, where it seemed the law was controlled by homosexual activists. There were specific groups of homosexuals carrying out this Nazi and Fascist kind of activity around the country against churches and others who opposed the homosexual movement to legitimize sodomy.[20] Caving in to this kind of activity and the incessant propaganda, many of our churches have abandoned the basic teachings of the Bible, and affirmed the acceptance of homosexuality as an "alternative lifestyle." Our churches, generally, have failed us in the fight against the homosexual movement. 

Professional organizations in the country were corrupted into the acceptance of sodomy as a right, including the American Medical Association and the American Bar Association. This was not really too difficult, since the colleges and universities, where they had all gotten degrees, were already fully corrupted into the acceptance of sodomy as a commendable thing. The schools of the country had long been indoctrinated with the false teaching of modern Darwinism, and of Alfred Kinsey and his group, and the acceptance of sodomy was almost automatic with the destruction of Judeo-Christian moral values inherent in those doctrines. The irrelevance of truth and factual support for a scientific or academic position on a matter naturally followed the destruction of the traditional moral values of truth and honesty. This was also an influence on the psychiatrists and psychologists. Many academics argued that there was no such thing as absolute truth. Political Correctness was all that really mattered. Real science gave way to pseudo science, which was used to validate such things as modern Darwinism, "man made global warming," homosexuality, and whatever other leftist movement was in vogue. 

Free, unrestricted, and open discussion on a subject, presentation of different and opposing ideas, studies, and observations is the way to arrive at the truth on a given subject. This is no longer allowed. Only things that are politically correct may be presented, or even discussed. News commentators, talk show hosts, entertainers, beauty pageant contestants or winners, teachers, instructors, professors, and even a university president may lose their positions and careers for even stating something on a controversial subject that is not politically correct. Even scientific research must comply. The search for the truth and freedom of speech are no longer allowed.

With the corruption of our universities, so were our law schools corrupted. The lawmakers and our courts are also greatly influenced to follow the liberal line on homosexuality. Liberal activist judges invented rights according to what was "politically correct," and falsely stated that they were protected under our constitutional Bill of Rights. Two examples are constitutional rights to abortion and to engage in sodomy. These things are covered in detail in the book on this website, A Way to Save Our Constitution From Judges.[21]

As noted above, in 1986 in Bowers v. Hardwick the Supreme Court of the United States correctly held that there was no constitutional right to engage in homosexual sodomy. Just seventeen years later our Supreme Court had been sufficiently corrupted by homosexual liberalism that it reversed Bowers v. Hardwick in Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003), and falsely declared that there was a constitutional right to engage in sodomy, in a 6 to 3 decision. I consider this to be the most clearly erroneous decision ever handed down by the Court. With the laws that were in effect against sodomy when our Bill of Rights was enacted, and when the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution was ratified, there is no way that the people responsible for the enactment of these provisions intended to overturn all of these laws and create a new and unheard of right to engage in sodomy. All of the things used to determine what was intended, such as records on debates; and writings by those involved in getting these provisions formed, passed by Congress, and ratified, such as the Federalist Papers; clearly show that it was not intended that such an unheard of right to engage in something that was universally condemned by western civilization would be created. The men who wrote and were responsible for the ratification of our Constitution were learned men, much more so than our politicians of today, and they well knew how to use the English language. Had there been an intention to create such a right, our Constitution would have clearly said so.

There are certain long accepted rules that are used to determine the purpose of a law, including a provision of a constitution. They are common sense rules that are used to determine the meaning of any writing. The primary rule is that you look first at its plain wording, to determine if further construction is required. If further construction is required, you look at the available evidence, to determine the purpose and intent of those responsible for its enactment. Any other method of construction or interpretation leaves it open for activist judges to invent and use any meaning they want. They do this and cite completely irrelevant things that were not even in existence when the law or constitutional provision was enacted, and could have had nothing whatsoever to do with the purpose behind a provision when it was enacted. This is done to try to falsely make it appear that the decision is supported in the law. This was exactly what was done in the majority opinion written by Justice Kennedy, in Lawrence v. Texas. The decision could not be supported by the intent and purpose of any provision of our Constitution, on which it had to based, so they held what was "politically correct" and cited things that had no relevance whatsoever to any provision in our Constitution, and things that occurred long after any relevant provision was enacted. This approach allows a judge to hold anything he wants, based on his own views, and then cite anything written or spoken that he can find to support it. It makes a mockery of the law and our Constitution. For support, the decision cited such things as what the British Parliament had done, the European Convention on Human Rights, and the European Court of Human rights. None of these things had anything whatsoever to do with the purpose of anything in our Bill of Rights, or the Fourteenth Amendment, on which the decision had to be based. These acts by those foreign organizations were long after our relevant constitutional provisions were enacted. The European Convention on Human Rights and European Court on Human Rights did not even exist then. The liberal judges on the Court changed our Constitution to what they considered best, according to their own personal biases, and social and political views. This was a clear violation of their oath to uphold our Constitution. It was an unlawful usurpation of the rights of the people.

Our Constitution begins with the words, "We the People." It was intended that we have a government "of the people, by the people, and for the people." It was not intended that our laws would be made or changed by an oligarchy of judges. Only the people and their representatives have a right to change our Constitution, and it must be done in the restricted manner provided by Article V of our Constitution. Had enough of our people wanted our Constitution to contain a right to engage in sodomy, they could have changed it to provide such a right, but they did not. The decision also violates the most basic right in our Constitution, and that is the right of the people to govern themselves on such matters, instead of being governed by a few imperialistic judges that were not even elected by them. 

But just gaining a fictitious constitutional right to engage in sodomy was not enough for the homosexualists. Their object was to brainwash the people into all accepting sodomy as a lifestyle equal in all respects to that of a decent family, including such things as adoption, and same-sex marriage. They want to force all people to consider homosexuals as people of good character, instead of the perverts that they are, in employment, who you rent to and have on your property, who you hire and have to associate with, and in all other matters. They wish to make it a "hate crime" to speak out against sodomy. They indeed want to create a world of make-believe; and, sadly, they are making great progress in that direction. Many aspects of our most basic human rights are being destroyed, and those are freedom to have and practice the Christian religion, freedom of speech, and freedom of the press. It is happening in the United States, and these rights have been severely restricted in Canada, and the more socialistic countries in Europe. In some of these countries it is a crime to quote a Bible passage condemning homosexuality in public or on the air. It is forbidden in the schools, even in America. Exerting complete mind control of the people is well underway. 

What the American people are allowing to be done to the children of this country is a shame and a disgrace. It has been happening in our colleges and universities for a long time, but in the last twenty-five years it has been widespread in our lower grade schools – even down to kindergarten. By plain old brainwashing, the move is well underway to erase all traditional American values, and all moral values, from their thinking. Children were once taught patriotism, the love of country, respect for our Constitution and Declaration of Independence, and respect for the founders and founding of this country. All of this is being eliminated and in its place, among other leftist teachings, is the teaching of "diversity," contempt for the Christian religion, radical feminism, and that sodomy is a respectable lifestyle. This is done with the help of the organization bearing the misnomer, American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the largest teachers' union, the National Education Association (NEA). Under the guise of sex education, anti-bullying, and sensitivity training, our children are taught that our old "taboos" of sex out of wedlock are archaic and wrong, and that all kinds of sex at any age is O.K. By this and the passing out of condoms to children, they are encouraged to engage in sex at an early age, and they do. They are taught that engaging in acts of sodomy are not only acceptable, but commendable, and they do. The plan, and it is already in progress, is to even extend these things to the little tykes in the kindergarten. The false, vile, and vicious Kinseyan teaching that children are sexually active at any age, even as babies, is in full control. They are even being taught that there is nothing wrong with pedophilia – a basic Kinseyan doctrine. When we corrupt the children of the country, the country is corrupted to its very core. [22]

The insane now run the asylum. We "homophobes" are now to be treated as the mentally ill.

If people can be convinced that engaging in sodomy is an acceptable alternative lifestyle, they can be convinced that right is wrong and wrong is right on any subject there is. They are that vulnerable to brainwashing. But why is this possible? The answer to that question is complicated, and I don't know of anyone that has all of the answers. Certainly, I do not.

I do believe that one of the problems is that many people are so apathetic. It seems to me that the less people have to struggle to make a living and get by in the world, the more apathetic they tend to be. They like their information in short sound bites. The last thing they want to do is read something that is complicated or lengthy. They would rather go with the flow and remain in ignorance. Many do not like to discuss anything that is controversial. That is why so many people like to avoid discussing religion or politics. Others like to avoid discussing the acts that constitute sodomy, because they are so vile and distasteful to them. Many people do not like to face the truth about the depraved things in which homosexuals engage, because members of their family, or close friends, are homosexual. There are many reasons behind it, but this apathy is destroying the very soul of our country. The rot of the soul of this country is much more dangerous than the threats of terrorism from without the country. The will to fight for our freedom and what is right is destroyed.


[1] A full PDF of this article, Selling Sodomy to America, may be found at: http://www.dijg.de/fileadmin/dijg-uploads/pdf/bulletin_8_2004_rondeau_en.pdf; and http://www.lifeissues.net/writers/rond/shta/shta_01sellinghomosexuality1.html

[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brainwashing

[3] Homosexuality: Good and Right in the Eyes of God?, by F. Earle Fox and David W. Virtue, Emmaus Ministries (2d Ed. 2002), p. 198 (This book and information may also be found online at http://books.google.com/books?id=cbfVg_1qhe0C&pg=PT50&lpg=PT50&dq=%22homosexuality:+good+and+right+in+the+eyes+of+god%3F%22&source=bl&ots=aDYac0Y-Ht&sig=CgQAnfsWr5ELlYaBk8qiLzKza7U&hl=en&ei=wsppS6G-BpXKsAP79MGdBQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CAcQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=&f=false); Also, on this website, see As We Sodomize America, Chapter 1, under Books; and The Depraved Excesses of Homosexual Lifestyles, under Articles.

[4] On this website, see As We Sodomize America, Chapter 1, under Books; and The Depraved Excesses of Homosexual Lifestyles, under Articles.

[5] http://www.americantraditions.org/Articles/A%20President%20Who%20Promotes%20Sodomy.htm

[6] http://www.glbtq.com/social-sciences/boycotts.html

[7] See Selling Sodomy to America, supra.

[8] http://www.stopdrlaura.com/

[9] See Selling Sodomy to America, supra.

[10] Ibid.

[11] As We Sodomize America, supra, Chapter 3 – Why Sodomy is Wrong.

[12]http://www.americantraditions.org/Articles/Charles%20Darwin%20and%20Alfred%20Kinsey%20-%20Destroyers%20of%20Judeo-Christian%20Morality.htm

[13] Supra.

[14] These things are covered in detail in Chapters 2, 6, and 7 of As We Sodomize America, supra.

[15] As We Sodomize America , Idem, pp. 45, 162, 379, 445-449.:

[16]http://books.google.com/books?id=UyhRbBHzneEC&pg=PA168&lpg=PA168&dq=claim+that+j+edgar+hoover+was+a+homosexual+%2Bwilliam+f.+buckley&source=bl&ots=4SA1tIJkDM&sig=3Z_chERwUk2_TSHQXFNpSn_nDxo&hl=en&ei=a7dWTZmVNpTGsAP_kLChDA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CBsQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q&f=false 

 [17] For example see The Pink Swastika and Holocaust Revisionist History, by Judith A. Reisman, PhD., on this website

[18] When the Wicked Seize a City, by Chuck and Donna McIlhenny, and Frank York (1993)

[19] An Account of this may also be found in As We Sodomize America, supra, pp. 123-125.

[20]As We Sodomize America, supra, pp. 122-123, 125-126, and various other parts of the book. 

[21] A Way to Save Our Constitution From Judges, by O. R. Adams Jr., on this website under Books..

[22] For details on what is being done to the Children of this country, in As We Sodomize America, supra, see the part, The Homosexual attack on our Children and Schools, pp. 500-545; and the articles on this website: Our Children Reflect Our Culture, Liberal Revisionists Present False History and Moral Decay, Abusing Children and Calling It Sex Education and Research, and How Homosexualists Redefine Homosexual Child Molesting, under Articles.

(BACK TO ARTICLES)