FACTS, TRUTH, AND MORALS ARE
IRRELEVANT TO DEMOCRATS
By O. R. Adams Jr.
© O. R. Adams Jr., 2007
(BACK TO ARTICLES)
The campaigns for the 2008 presidential election are heating up, and it is interesting to see the radical and immoral things come to light that are supported by all of the major Democratic candidates. Some things they try to hide and to sidestep, but a close examination will bring out the truth. It appears that there is no extreme radical and immoral thing in issue that is not supported by the Democrats and their liberal cohorts.
They are pro-abortion, no matter how extreme and how cruel. They even believe in finishing off the killing of babies that have managed to survive abortions and have actually been born and are alive.
They would teach us that the vile and depraved acts of sodomy are an acceptable thing in our society. Although many sidestep the homosexual marriage issue, in public, they actually support it, and all support the recognition of legal unions of those engaging in sodomy.
The Democrats, and their cohort, the ACLU, continually work to promote and protect pornography – even child pornography. They of course are also aided greatly by liberal members of our courts – particularly those on the Untied States Supreme Court.
They support every environmental movement that anyone can dream up, no matter how radical or ill informed, from protecting the silvery minnow in New Mexico, the spotted owl in the Northwest, to their big thing now – Global warming – ignoring all evidence contrary to their views.
I will specifically touch on just a few of these things in this article.
Pro-Abortion – No Matter How Inhuman and Extreme
All major Democratic presidential candidates support unlimited abortion on demand.
The Democrats have continually opposed legislation outlawing the inhumane procedure of partial birth abortion, where well developed babies are partially delivered, and then their little heads are crushed, thereby killing them. What a gruesome thing to be supported by a supposedly civilized people!
Let's look at a vote of Barack Hussein Obama when he was a State Senator in Illinois. The following is from "Obama More Pro-Choice Than Naral," by Amanda Carpenter, Human Events, December 25, 2005. The following are some short excerpts from the article:
In 2002, as an Illinois legislator, Obama voted against the Induced Infant Liability Act, which would have protected babies that survived late-term abortions. That same year a similar federal law, the Born Alive Infant Protection Act, was signed by President Bush. Only 15 members of the U.S. House opposed it, and it passed the Senate unanimously on a voice vote. ...
Jill Stanek, a registered delivery-ward nurse who was the prime mover behind the legislation after she witnessed aborted babies being born alive and left to die, testified twice before Obama in support of the Induced Infant Liability Act bills. She also testified before the U.S. Congress in support of the Born Alive Infant Protection Act.
Stanek told me her testimony "did not faze" Obama.
The people who kill babies, born and unborn, like to call the babies "fetuses" to salve their guilty consciences, but humans who have been born and are alive are human babies – they are not fetuses.
Pro-Sodomy – All The Way
Watching the Democratic presidential candidates struggle before the public on the homosexual issues goes from amusing to pathetic. But they must toe the pro-sodomy line. Our New Mexico Governor, Bill Richardson, took the cake. He made the front page of the Albuquerque Journal, August 11, 2007, under the banner headline, Gay Gaffe Has Gov. Reeling.
The article explains that in the homosexual forum in Los Angeles, he was asked, "Do you think homosexuality is a choice or is it biological?" His answer: "It's a choice." That really hit the fan with that group, because their current line is that it is inherited. Richardson obviously said what he believed – he was just ignorant of the agenda these Democratic candidates are supposed to follow. His campaign immediately issued the statement that he "misspoke" and made an error. The article makes it even more hilarious. It states that in a telephone interview with the Journal, he said he was tired from cross-country travel, misunderstood what he thought was a "trick question" and flubbed the answer.
After having studied homosexuality and the homosexual agenda for several years, and writing extensively on it (as this website shows), I believe that the root cause of homosexuality has not yet been determined, but that the preponderance of the evidence is that it is acquired and not inherited. As I noted, with documentation, in the Chapter, Causes Of and Cures For Homosexuality, in As We Sodomize America, many homosexuals change their "orientation" several times during their life. It is hard for me to see how they could be born both ways. So I would say that Richardson was probably right. But facts and truth are irrelevant to homosexual activists and other liberals.
One of the most liberal publications in the country is Newsweek. It is Democrat all the way. In the August 13, 2007, issue, it had the article, Show 'Em Whatcha Got, about Hillary Clinton's almost "rock star" status with the homosexual community. It tells about some of the things she and President Bill Clinton did for the "Gays." Although she voted against the amendment to limit marriage to a man and a woman, this is not enough for that bunch. They want her to more openly promote their causes, like Bill did.
The first chapter of As We Sodomize America describes in graphic detail the eight most common vile and depraved acts by which homosexuals get their classification. Although even our school children are now being taught that such acts are not only acceptable conduct, but commendable, I believe strongly that anyone that cannot see that such acts are vile and sinful has something seriously missing.
The liberals are now trying to force all of us to fully accept sodomy. That is the purpose of the "hate crime" laws. They want to force a change in our thinking They want to teach us that right is wrong and wrong is right – by force of law. They want to take away both our freedom of speech and our freedom of religion. In Canada and some other countries now, a person can be punished for quoting what the Bible says about homosexuality. In our own colleges, universities, and public schools, the homosexual line must be adhered to or severe punishment follows. What is happening to our country?
Pornography – Even Child Pornography
Before the precipitous decline in morality in this country, we did not have pornography in the movies or on TV. It was illegal to transmit pornography through the mails. In the 1960s, our decline in morality began as part and parcel of the drug culture, the homosexual movement, and sexual permissiveness, generally. Dr. Alfred Kinsey, and his false and fraudulent teachings played a part in it. Pornography is an integral part of the homosexual culture.
The Reagan administration, acting through Attorney General Edwin Meese, made a major drive against pornography. This drive continued through the first President Bush's administration. Not only was it discontinued under President Clinton, but pornography along with sodomy was encouraged during his administration. With the help of the liberals in public offices and in the courts, and their agent, the ACLU, we cannot now even completely bar child pornography. The homosexual organization, North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA), has long worked for legalizing sex with children, so that homosexuals would be legally free to prey on young boys. (For the openly stated goals of this organization see their current website at http://www.nambla.org/welcome.htm.) The homosexual groups have had great success in getting age limits lowered on sexual consent. Until recently, they even had a website devoted to lowering the age of consent, and informing homosexuals what the age of consent was in different states. That particular website seems to have disappeared, and other organizations taken over. (see http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=564251) As previously stated, pornography, including child pornography, has always been an important part of the homosexual culture. In As We Sodomize America, I cover these things in detail. In the article on this website, The "Fairness Doctrine" is Unconstitutional, I explain the extent to which child pornography has been made a "constitutional right" by our United States Supreme Court.
Thanks to the Democrats and other liberals in our society, moving pictures, television, and the internet are now laden with pornographic filth.
The Democrats have embraced the most extreme ideas presented on global warming. The politically correct line is that it is caused by industry and vehicles. All evidence to the contrary must be ignored, and treated like it doesn't exist.
However, I believe that there are other things worthy of consideration.
Other planets in our solar system also have "global warming." Mars and Venus are heating up. (http://www.channel4.com/science/microsites/U/ukweather2080/guides/planets.html ) Our industry and automobiles did not cause their global warming.
The Democrats and the environmentalists would have us believe that we are in the midst of the greatest warming period in history. The truth is that the hottest summer of record was in 1936. (http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2006/s2700.htm) How did our present day industry and automobiles cause that?
Since the hot periods in the 1930s, these same types of alarmists were warning us, in the 1970s, of "global cooling" and perhaps an ice age coming upon us. (http://newsbusters.org/node/12137) The ice ages are actually something we should carefully consider in light of all of this hodge podge being presented to us today.
We have had a great many ice ages over at least the last 600 million years. The Microsoft Encarta 99 Desk Encyclopedia states:
Although the cause of ice ages is a subject of controversy, one argument has gained credibility in recent years. The earth and its solar system are located asymmetrically within one limb of the Milky Way galaxy, which completes one rotation about once every 300 million years, taking the solar system through denser and thinner regions of interstellar dust and through changing gravity and magnetic fields. It appears that every 150 million years a very slight change takes place in the solar system's galactic environment, possibly altering the earth's climate. In addition, earth-based processes are involved through the climatic changes associated with continental drift (see Plate Tectonics). Scientists theorize that in a situation of slight external cooling because of the galaxy's rotation, as well as a favorable geographic-oceanographic setting, minor variations in the earth's orbit cause a chain reaction of cooling. Within each ice age are fluctuations known as glacials and interglacials: cold and warm phases that correspond to a cycle of about 100,000 years. These cycles were first worked out by early-20th-century Yugoslav scientist Milutin Milankovitch.
The longest of the ancient ice ages was probably the Permo-Carboniferous, which began about 300 million years ago. Still earlier, about 435 million years ago, another ice sheet extended from Brazil to North Africa and all the way across to Yemen and Saudi Arabia. About 600 million years ago, another glacial age occurred. Evidence of these ancient ice ages is provided by layers of tillite, a rock consisting of hardened glacial drift.
These ice ages were not caused by our present day industry or our automobiles. After each ice age there was a very beneficial period of global warming. Land was exposed and became livable for humans, plants, and animals.
Today, assuming that we have glacial melting as is indicated, it might actually turn out to be beneficial to the world, on the whole. More usable land may become available. I do not think that anyone really knows at this time what the answer is. All of this present doom and gloom may be unfounded. There are different scientists with altogether different opinions on many of these matters. All sides need to be considered. The Democrats completely ignore everything that is contrary to their doom and gloom agenda. That seems to be their natural way.
For many years I was a Democrat, as was Ronald Reagan. We changed for the same reasons. The Democrat Party became the organ of the extreme left. They get worse each year. They have never been as bad as they are now. A country that would elect people like that to public office deserves them.
(BACK TO ARTICLES)