Who Promotes Sodomy
© O. R.
Adams Jr. 2011
BACK TO ARTICLES
Hussein Obama has of late been heaping great praise on homosexuality. He has
indicated that he is now rethinking his position on homosexual marriage,
and Vice President Joe Biden has led the way in expressly supporting
"gay" marriage. He said there is an “inevitability for a national
consensus on gay marriage.”
During the ceremonies
celebrating the repeal of Don't Ask Don't Tell (DADT), Senate Leader Harry Reid
parroted the phrase now becoming a favorite of the homosexualists: "We
don't care who they love as long as they love their country."
I believe that it indeed takes a sick mind to call the unnatural,
lustful, and debasing acts of sodomy "love."
In discussing issues on homosexuality, we should first consider the acts by which homosexuals get their classification.
If research statistics are correct, 100% of male homosexuals engaged in oral sex. Approximately 93% engage in anal sex, inserting the penis into the anus of the partner. 92% engage in "rimming", touching the anus of one's partner with one's tongue and inserting the tongue into the anus. 47% engage in "fisting", inserting one's fist into the anus of the partner. 29% engage in "golden showers", urinating on each other. 17% engage in "scat", the eating of feces, or rubbing of feces on each other, and in "mud rolling", rolling on the floor where feces have been deposited. It is not uncommon for a homosexual person to declaw and defang a mouse or other rodent to be inserted into the colon.
Each and everyone of the above related acts are unnatural, sick and depraved, but such acts are far from all of the things common to homosexuals that have made homosexuality so condemned over the ages by Western culture. Sex in public and public sexual displays, pedophilia, and many forms of violence are common to the homosexual lifestyle.
Obama, who I
consider the worst President with which this country was ever plagued, with the
help of the Democrat congress, which is further to the left of the political
spectrum than any we have ever had, will now burden our military forces with the
acceptance of openly practicing homosexuals. Not only will our military men and
women have to put up with the close association with people who openly engage in
the depraved acts described above, but they will be subjected to many more
sexual assaults by homosexuals. In past years, when homosexuals were barred from
being in the service, and in the years when they could be in if they were not
openly homosexual, many terrible assaults were still made on our military men
and women by homosexuals who had illegally entered the service.
Large numbers of homosexuals from
It apparently amazed a goodly number of others, as well—including staff and students who, less titillated than scandalized, left notes of their own ('Why can't a Harvard boy go to the john in this dump without being groped by a seedy queer?') in library suggestion boxes, taking violent exception to the ongoing lavatorial passion play—because reportedly, the Harvard Police, accompanied by maintenance personnel, eventually elbowed their way into the dramatis personae.
Abruptly—and to the great dismay of those who need privacy to do their business—the doors disappeared from every toilet stall in the main Harvard Science Center men's room, and uniformed policemen were periodically observed patrolling the premises for perverts. Predictably, a protest— at once sardonically amused and annoyed—by one Scott Long appeared in the Harvard Gay and Lesbian Newsletter mocking the straight staff, students, and police who had whipped up a "tempest in a tearoom."
Despite their high visibility, and attempts by authorities to squelch them, however, a coterie of gay men continues, daily and nightly, to perform the play before what is, all too often, an S.R.O. straight audience—in the men's rooms of Ivy League Colleges, and in the public lavatories, parks, and alleyways of every major city in the United States. Theirs is the wretchedest of all gay excesses.
Such men make no attempt to secure privacy for their intercourse, whether by locating a disused utility closet or waiting for a lull in the pedestrian traffic in and out of the lavatory; indeed, for many the dangerous possibility of being apprehended entr'acte is three fourths of the thrill. They masturbate at the urinals, wander totally naked up and down the length of the facility, and fellate one another in acrobatic positions in the open doorways of the stalls. When they ejaculate—and they do—on the seats, walls, or floors, they leave it there to congeal into a nasty, highly identifiable puddle. One can imagine the effect such a charming tableau has upon a young, sheltered, or uptight straight man, when he comes upon it suddenly and unexpectedly in a place in which he is accustomed to do his embarrassing but necessary business in peace and quiet.
What do you think our service men and women will now be exposed to in their barracks, their showers, and their restrooms? Are these things now acceptable in civilized countries?
"gays" are allowed to congregate there will not only be sexual
advances going on, but violent criminal conduct. Retired Col. Richard H. Black
is an attorney who was Chief of the Army's Criminal Law Division at the Pentagon
from 1992-94. As a Marine pilot, he flew 269 combat missions in
7 Days, 60 Public Gay Crimes at Fort Hood, Texas
Even as Congress was wrestling with
Clinton's proposal on gays, officials were dealing with a major homosexual scandal at Ft. Hood, Texas. Gays had advertised a Ft. Hoodrestroom as a gathering spot for casual consensual sex. In just seven days, criminal investigators observed 60 men publicly committing serious acts on post. Officers, NCOs and enlisted personnel participated. Many wore uniforms displaying their insignia of rank. ...
At the Criminal Law Division, facts contradicted that party line [of the Clinton Administration]. Worldwide criminal reports documented serious offenses being frequently committed by homosexual GIs.
[Specific cases of assaults on military men and women are given, in addition to the examples, below.]
Gays dismiss concerns regarding privacy in showers and in the barracks. But the risk is high. At
in 1991, two homosexual recruits caught a lone soldier showering at night. They violently sodomized the soldier, forcing him to submit by strangling him with a bath towel. At the time of trial, the victim was hospitalized under psychiatric care. Ft. Sill, Oklahoma
Recruit training is especially problematic. Male recruits had to physically subdue one homosexual drill instructor at an Army base to keep him from raping a male recruit as that recruit struggled to escape out a second-story window. At Marine boot camp, an aggressive female recruit was discharged for sexually touching and soliciting fellow Marines. Her intimidating manner caused fear and distrust throughout her platoon. At
Quantico, a company gunnery sergeant sexually attacked a young officer candidate who had stayed back at the barracks while his platoon was out training.
Rep. Ike Skelton (D-Mo.), Chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, spoke firmly against dropping the ban on homosexuals, stating that it would cause "disruption" and "serious problems." (Skelton opposes repeal of 'Don't ask, don't tell' TheHill.com
Jan. 15, 2010). Ike Skelton is correct.
And assaults aren't the only problem. Few things threaten unit cohesion more than consensual sex between gays while others are present. The
Ft.Hoodincident demonstrates how public sex among homosexual officers, NCOs and men destroys respect for rank. How would men respond to such officers and noncoms in battle? ...
With the repeal of DADT, there is no doubt that "sensitivity training" will now be given our service men and women. They must be brainwashed into believing that sodomy is an acceptable and commendable practice. It has already been done in federal government agencies, and in our colleges, universities, and public schools. It has long been an important part of the homosexual agenda. One high-ranking officer, a Lieutenant Colonel, refuses to be party to the homosexual indoctrination of our service men and women and has already been reassigned "from a command to a staff position so he will not have to order troops to undergo the Pentagon's pro-'gay' indoctrination."
Most of the homosexuals that were dismissed from the military under DADT were dismissed because of offenses such as those described above had been committed. In his jubilation in the repeal of DADT Obama expressly invited those who were discharged under that law to reenlist in the service. This is a clear invitation to disaster in the military.
At the signing the
repeal of the DADT law, President Obsama heaped great praise on homosexuals in
the military, although he was quite short on specifics of any great things done
He failed to mention
that most of the homosexuals removed from the military were because of such
things as advances and sexual assaults on other service members, and such things
as preying on service men in restrooms, as went on at the
He also failed to mention that PFC Bradley Manning, currently under arrest, was a homosexual in the military, and the one who recently leaked the classified military information to WikiLeaks. Manning should have been removed long before his treasonous activity occurred.
Although in the military service, Manning had his own anti-military bent, based on his opposition to the defense policy of keeping open and active homosexuals out, and advertised his homosexuality on his Facebook page.
Gawker.com reports that "A screen capture of Manning's Facebook profile shows the pages he liked were almost exclusively LGBT-related, including LGBT America, Gay Marriage, Equality Maryland, Dan Savage, Human Rights Campaign, etc."
President also said that company commanders would be given authority to
accommodate the special needs of homosexuals. Are we now going to have
"gay" "married" couples openly cohabiting in the barracks,
or in quarters for married couples? What a terrible thing to be forced on
decent men and women who enlisted in the military service to serve their
Having open homosexuals in our military services forces extreme danger
of HIV and AIDS on our military men and women.
Gay and bisexual men — referred to in CDC surveillance systems as men who have sex with men (MSM) — of all races continue to be the risk group most severely affected by HIV. Additionally, this is the only risk group in the
U.S. in which the annual number of new HIV infections is increasing. ...
[T]he rate of new HIV diagnoses among MSM [homosexual men] in the U.S. is more than 44 times that of other [heterosexual] men ... . [Emphasis added.]
The deadly HIV virus, and resulting AIDS, can be contracted in a number of ways. Established ways are through the contact of saliva or blood of a contaminated person, as well as through sexual relations. A very common way is through blood transfusions. Not all of the ways that this deadly virus may be contracted are known. There are established cases where people have contracted the disease, and the way in which it was done was not determined, but the common ways named were ruled out. A great many homosexuals have intentionally infected others with HIV. In any event, our service men and women should not be forced into the close relationship with homosexuals that comes through military life, particularly in the field, where many have had do such things as sharing small tents and shelters together.
Homosexuals introduced the deadly AIDS virus into this country and spread it among themselves and to innocent people. They have done a terrible damage to themselves, and to innocent people who are not homosexuals. They contaminated blood supplies, sometimes intentionally, and were the cause of many completely innocent people dying of AIDS. Thousands of their victims were innocent children with hemophilia, who had to have blood transfusions to live, and who had done nothing to deserve the terrible death inflicted upon them. I know of no other time in history when such devastation has been caused by such intentional vile and despicable acts. Yet, instead of being given the condemnation they deserve, they have been praised by our liberal news media and politicians.
A very high percentage of homosexuals, today, are infected with HIV. And there is no way to even tell for sure whether a person has HIV. The statistics of the Center for Disease Control, referred to above, are therefore conservative. This presents an extreme and deadly danger that would be particularly incurred in combat situations, where bloody and wounded soldiers must be handled, and where a person immediately needs a blood transfusion from an available comrade. Actually, in the usual case there would be no time for testing for HIV, even if there were dependable tests. Probably very few of our troops, as well as few civilians, actually know the terrible risk of forcing on them this close association with homosexuals, or getting blood transfusions from them. They probably think that those who handle blood transfusions would take precautions to protect them. But this is impossible when blood is taken from homosexuals, or when there is close contact with homosexuals. A high percentage of them are infected with HIV, and there is no way to tell with any certainty if one is infected.
There has always been a "negative window" of time in which a person contracts the HIV virus, and can pass it on to others, and no test will determine with any certainty whether or not the person has the virus. This window of time has been assessed at anywhere from three months to three years. Even now there is no test that can positively detect the HIV (AIDS) virus. The Federal Food and Drug Administration states: "Blood donor testing using current advanced technologies has greatly reduced the risk of HIV transmission but cannot yet detect all infected donors or prevent all transmission by transfusions." For that reason, under federal regulation, homosexuals are prohibited from donating blood. However, the homosexuals are continually fighting to have that regulation removed. All you have to do is do a Google search (use: homosexual +blood donor), and you will find many articles by homosexuals advocating that this be changed, and calling it "discrimination." The intent of these people is criminal. They want to drag everyone down to their level, including having everyone as disease contaminated as they are.
Homosexuals who want to do things that they know will give AIDS to innocent people are worse than just mentally sick – they are evil and criminal.
I also consider it criminal for our President Obama and
the Democrat congress to force this danger on our men and women serving us in
the armed forces of this country.
like President Obama have never really liked our military forces, and certainly
this is a means by which they will destroy morale in the military, and help tear
down the effectiveness of our armed forces.
also believe that the problem of blood transfusions with homosexuals in the
military will lead to another big homosexualist push to remove the federal ban
on homosexuals being blood donors in civilian life. Why should our military be
put to more danger than civilians. So the increased and extreme danger of HIV
and resulting AIDS will be forced upon all of us.
I have no doubt that as soon as our President feels that the country has been brainwashed to the extent that he can do it without damaging his chances for re-election, he will openly and aggressively promote the blessing of sodomy with the holy sacrament of marriage. He will not be happy until the sodomizing of America is complete. He has already been the most effective promoter of sodomy there has ever been in this country.
 Homosexuality: Good and Right in the Eyes of God?, by F. Earle Fox and David W. Virtue, Emmaus Ministries (2d Ed. 2002), p. 198 (This book and information may also be found online at http://books.google.com/books?id=cbfVg_1qhe0C&pg=PT50&lpg=PT50&dq=%22homosexuality:+good+and+right+in+the+eyes+of+god%3F%22&source=bl&ots=aDYac0Y-Ht&sig=CgQAnfsWr5ELlYaBk8qiLzKza7U&hl=en&ei=wsppS6G-BpXKsAP79MGdBQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CAcQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=&f=false);
Homosexuals Are Destructive to Our
Military Forces, on this website under Articles, http://www.americantraditions.org/Articles/Homosexuals%20are%20Destructive%20to%20Our%20Military.htm
For references on the dangers imposed, read the part on Spreading AIDS and other Sexually Transmitted Diseases, in the article on
this website, The Depraved Excesses of Homosexual Lifestyles, on
this website, http://www.americantraditions.org/Articles/depraved_excesses_of_homosexual_.htm
BACK TO ARTICLES