A free online magazine devoted to Christian values, traditional American values, and upholding the United States Constitution. For more on this see the ABOUT page.

Free articles and books are also made available under the pages, Articles and Books. The Home Page will be the current magazine section. It will be arranged by Months, and periodically updated. Older editions will be put in Archives. After the Magazine section, these books and articles are described, and there are additional hyperlinks to the respective books and articles.  

 Comments made are by the Editor, O. R. Adams Jr., unless otherwise indicated. 

May, 2008

Do We Have Global Warming or Global Cooling?

When the liberals adopt a position, views to the contrary are either killed or severely censored. This is done by both the media and academia. It does not matter whether or not the question is a scientific one that should be objectively explored from all sides. To the liberal, there can be but one side. One small example is the question of Global Warming.

Global warming crusader Al Gore repeatedly claims the climate change “debate’s over.” It isn’t, but the news media clearly agree with him. Global warming skeptics rarely get any say on the networks, and when their opinions are mentioned it is often with barbs like “cynics” or “deniers” thrown in to undermine them.  

Consistently viewers are being sent only one message from ABC, CBS and NBC: global warming is an environmental catastrophe and it’s mankind’s fault. Skepticism is all but shut out of reports through several tactics – omission, name-calling, the hype of frightening images like polar bears scavenging for food near towns and a barrage of terrifying predictions. ("Global Warming Censored – How the Major Networks Silence the Debate on Climate Change," by Julia A. Seymour and Dan Gainor, Business and Media Institute. http://www.businessandmedia.org/specialreports/2008/GlobalWarmingCensored/GlobalWarmingCensored_execsum.asp)

Prominent hurricane forecaster Dr. William M. Gray, a professor at Colorado State University, and founder of the Weather Channel, predicts we will have global cooling within ten years. http://www.businessandmedia.org/articles/2008/20080304113132.aspx

Dr. Oleg Sorokhtin, Merited Scientist of Russia and fellow of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences, and staff researcher of the Oceanology Institute, also predicts that within ten years we will have global cooling, and gives some very interesting information to back up his prediction. Dr. Sorokhtin states:

The real reasons for climate changes are uneven solar radiation, terrestrial precession (that is, axis gyration), instability of oceanic currents, regular salinity fluctuations of the Arctic Ocean surface waters, etc. There is another, principal reason—solar activity and luminosity. The greater they are the warmer is our climate.

Astrophysics knows two solar activity cycles, of 11 and 200 years. Both are caused by changes in the radius and area of the irradiating solar surface. The latest data, obtained by Habibullah Abdusamatov, head of the Pulkovo Observatory space research laboratory, say that Earth has passed the peak of its warmer period, and a fairly cold spell will set in quite soon, by 2012. Real cold will come when solar activity reaches its minimum, by 2041, and will last for 50-60 years or even longer. http://en.rian.ru/analysis/20080103/94768732.html

Others say that we are already into the period of global cooling.

A Fox News report states ( 2-28-2008 ):

Tuesday we told you about several areas around the planet experiencing record cold and snowpack — in the face of all the predictions of global warming.

Now there is word that all four major global temperature tracking outlets have released data showing that temperatures have dropped significantly over the last year. California meteorologist Anthony Watts says the amount of cooling ranges from 65-hundredths of a degree Centigrade to 75-hundreds of a degree.

That is said to be a value large enough to erase nearly all the global warming recorded over the past 100 years. It is reportedly the single fastest temperature change ever recorded — up or down.

Some scientists contend the cooling is the result of reduced solar activity — which they say is a larger driver of climate change than man-made greenhouse gases. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,333328,00.html

An interesting article, Global Cooling?, by Dennis Avery,  American Conservative Union, gives information indicating that we have been in global cooling since 1998. http://acuf.org/issues/issue62/060624cul.asp

Australian News also report that scientists, including the head of the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), have also acknowledged that, taking 1998 as a reference point, we are also in global cooling. Jennifer Marohasy, a biologist and senior fellow of Melbourne-based think tank, the Institute of Public Affairs, states:

It's not only that it's not discussed. We never hear it, do we? Whenever there's any sort of weather event that can be linked into the global warming orthodoxy, it's put on the front page. But a fact like that, which is that global warming stopped a decade ago, is virtually never reported, which is extraordinary. http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,23411799-7583,00.html

Global warming or global cooling is a subject that is critically important to the world, and its economy. What we need is for the scientists, academia, and the news media to move from political correctness back to true objective science.  

Your Freedom to Practice Your Religion is Being Taken From You 

by Homosexualists

In New Mexico last week the state "Human Rights Commission" held that a woman violated the state civil rights laws when she refused to photograph a  same-sex "commitment" ceremony by two lesbians. The woman's uncontradicted statements were that her refusal was based on her religious beliefs, which would be violated by her participation. Certainly there were other photographers that could have been obtained, and apparently were, because no damages were awarded. But it was ordered that the lesbians would be reimbursed $6,637.94 in attorney fees by the photographer. The message is that not only must we forsake our religious beliefs and accept sodomy, but that we must help those who engage in sodomy celebrate it. This is clear violation of a person's right under the First Amendment of our United States Constitution to practice his or her religion. 

The Alliance Defense Fund has stated that it will appeal the decision for the woman. I hope that the organization and the parties persist in appealing the case all the way to the United States Supreme Court, if necessary, to uphold this woman's rights and establish that the first (and some consider the most important) of our basic constitutional rights, in the Bill of Rights, which is that our right to the free exercise of our religion shall not be abridged, is not meaningless. Freedom to practice the Christian religion without government coercion was a primary factor in establishing America. It was the reason many of our forefathers, such as the Pilgrims and the Puritans,  came to this country. 

The Alliance Defense Fund is a fine organization that has valiantly and successfully fought for our religions rights over the years. This organization has been added to the Organizations section of this website as an organization worthy of support. 

       ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This is the end of the Current Magazine Section. The following is an explanation of the books and articles in those respective sections of this website. 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

As explained under the heading of this Home Page, the mission of this magazine is to uphold the Christian values, traditional American values, and our United State Constitution, which have together been the backbone of our American culture. Christian traditions, and American traditions, which are based upon Judeo-Christian principles, are critically important to making America a great country. In this regard, books and articles are included under those sections. The following are short reviews of them.

The book, AS WE SODOMIZE AMERICA – THE HOMOSEXUAL MOVEMENT AND THE DECLINE OF MORALITY IN AMERICA, is a very comprehensive book on homosexuality, acts of homosexuals, causes of and cures for homosexuality, history of homosexuality, the homosexual movement, and the interconnection between those things and the decline of morality in America. This decline in morality was not primarily caused by the homosexual movement, but that movement could not have taken place without the decline in morality which made the movement possible. Many things are working together toward our moral decline and disintegration of family values. This moral decline and disintegration of family values, is something that should concern all of us. America and Christianity have always been considered synonymous, until America's decline in morality. There has been a precipitous moral decline in America during the last forty years. Morality in America has declined with the acceptance of sodomy in America.

There is considerable history of homosexuality and history of sodomy laws included in the book. Homosexuality in America, and the conflicts between homosexuality and religion, and traditional American values, are covered at length. Toleration of homosexuality is toleration of immorality.

It was once proudly stated, even by our Courts, that "America is a Christian nation." George Washington taught us that Religion is necessary to moral values. He was of course speaking of the Christian religion.

Homosexuality and the Constitution are covered, including cases on the subject. The history of sodomy laws along with history of sodomy in America is also included.

Homosexuality and sodomy are used interchangeably in the book. Homosexuality and pornography also seem to go together. Videos are reviewed relating to "Gay" parades, which show very obscene activities and demonstrate the relationship between pornography and homosexuals. Lewdness and homosexuals seem to naturally go together in those parades. (A search of the internet will also show the relationship between pornography and homosexuality.) Homosexuality and atheism often go hand in hand. In their parades and celebrations, the denigration of religion and Jesus are common. There can be no compatibility between true religion and homosexuality. Neither Christianity and homosexuality nor Judaism and homosexuality are compatible. Neither homosexuality and morality nor homosexuals and morality are compatible. A homosexual, as the word is used in the book, is defined as one who willingly engages in one or more of the acts of sodomy related in the book with a person of the same sex.

In the chapter on causes of homosexuality, and cures for homosexuality, deplorable actions of professional organizations are explained – they are abandoning homosexuals who want help with their problems.

Pedophilia and the harmful and unnatural relationships between homosexuals and young people, and even homosexuals and children, are covered at length. Homosexuals in youth organizations, and homosexuals and the Boy Scouts of America have had some disastrous consequences. Homosexual attacks on boy scouts, homosexual attacks on young people, and homosexual attacks on children are all well documented in the book. Homosexual Priests sexually attacked many young boys, costing the Catholic Church untold millions of dollars in civil actions. Many priests and scout leaders were prosecuted for sexual attacks on young boys and for sodomy. Homosexuals and the adoption of children have also been a problem for the same reasons. Also, it just does not present a natural family relationship, and it is certainly contrary to traditional family values.

The homosexual movement, with the help of the National Education Association (NEA), was very successful in infiltration of the schools. Sex education in schools is often aimed at promoting sodomy in schools. Promoting homosexuality in schools and mixing sex education and homosexuality has been a plan of that movement, and a successful one. Homosexual sodomy is taught as acceptable. Teaching that amounts to promoting sodomy by children is unacceptable. There has been a homosexual brainwashing of school children. Promoting homosexuality in public schools has been much more prevalent than in private schools – particularly religious schools.

Many churches have capitulated to the homosexual movement, and many are at the crossroads. Homosexuals and churches have never really been compatible, because of the contradiction to traditional family values. The Anglican and Episcopal churches are having a life and death struggle over homosexual marriage, and the admission of homosexuals as priests or ministers. Several denominations have caved in and bless same-sex marriage. Homosexuals in the Catholic Church have long been a problem. Many churches are abandoning their biblical principles, and many churches have lost their moral base. The acceptance of sodomy, and moreover the blessing of sodomy in same-sex marriage, is not acceptable for a church that has the Bible as the basis of its religion. Sodomy is one of the most condemned things in the Bible, as clearly shown by the material in As We Sodomize America.

The homosexualists have invented a number of terms, and misused others, as a part of their propaganda. Examples are gay, homophobia, homophobe, homophobic, bigot, bigotry, and latent homosexuality. Such words, as used, have two purposes. First, they gloss over the depravity of sodomy and homosexuality, and, secondly, they are used to intimidate those who consider such things unacceptable in your society. The media dutifully parrot them. Even some of our most conservative talk show and media people use them, just in the way they were intended. All are not doing it to further the homosexual movement, but their inadvertence has the same effect. Liberal control of the media and academia have furthered the liberal agendas of the homosexual movement, anti-Christian and anti-religious denigration, abortion, feminism, Darwinian evolution, and about all other political and social agendas so detrimental to this country.

The American Psychological Association, American Psychiatric Association, American Medical Association, and the American Bar Association have all caved in to the homosexual movement.

Generally, the Republican Party has supported our traditional moral values more than the Democrat Party, but today many Republicans are also bowing to the homosexual and liberal onslaught. Democrats and homosexual marriage have more unity than Republicans and same-sex marriage.

The first Chapter of the book deals with the nature of the acts of homosexuality. It contains graphic descriptions of the acts homosexuals and statistics on homosexual acts.

The book goes at length into the effect that our decline in morality has had on children, generally. Disciplinary problems in public schools have grown at a rapid rate. Interesting statistics are given on this problem.

Our family values have broken down to an alarming extent. Toleration of having children out of wedlock has turned to acceptance as nothing immoral. America has lost its moral compass.

A Way to Save Our Constitution From Judges, by O. R. adams Jr.  is a comprehensive book that covers in detail particular cases that have been decided by our Courts -- particularly the United States Supreme Court, and the damage done to our Constitution by some of these decisions.  

Article V of our Constitution, provides that our Constitution may be changed only by the people and their representatives. It takes two thirds of both houses of our federal legislature, or two thirds of the legislatures of the states to commence an amendment; It then must be approved by three fourths of the legislatures  of the states or by conventions in three fourths of the states -- thus providing for strong federal weighting. Yet liberal Supreme Court justices have often usurped this sole right of the people and their representatives, and unlawfully changed our Constitution to their own liking -- often by bare majorities of the Court. This is indeed a disgraceful situation. 

The basic problem is that our Constitution has no curb for activist judges, except impeachment, which they obviously do not fear. There is nothing in our Constitution that states how a law or a constitutional provision should be interpreted by the courts. The courts, and particularly the United States Supreme Court, make their own rules for interpretation. Although our early Supreme Court justices developed rules for interpretation that determined the meaning for a provision of our Constitution to be that which was intended by those who formed and ratified it, later liberal justices left those long accepted rules, and began substituting their own personal views thereby clanging our Constitution from what was intended by those forming and enacting it to what these particular liberal judges thought it should be. 

This judicial misbehavior by liberal judges has imposed completely erroneous meanings that must now be followed because by the Court's own interpretations these decisions are now controlling. The article on this website, Saving Our Constitution From Judges, is a concise summary of this book. 

The book contains an easy way that this damage can be prevented by a simple Constitutional amendment requiring that judges construe the meaning of a provision to be that which was intended by those responsible for enacting it, as it should be, and as it was long ago recognized by our early courts. This would also take judges out of politics and put them back into being judges as was intended by our Constitution. 

The proposed amendment would not only prevent such future damage to our Constitution, but, in time, would tend to correct all erroneous decisions that have been made in the past. 

The Declaration of Independence and Constitution of the United States are merely copies of those important documents. The Declaration does have the names of the signers and their respective occupations, which should be of interest. It was remarked that "we either hang together or we will hang separately" – how true that was when they had the courage to sign that document.

The Temple of Karnak -- How Rogue Judges Have Been Strangling Your , by D. J. Connolly, PH.D. Mr. Connolly received his Ph.D. in engineering From Case Western Reserve University in 1971. He worked as a research engineer and in middle management at NASA's Glenn Research Center for thirty-six years. He certainly put his research abilities to good use in gathering the material for this book. The book is about our imperialist judges -- particularly justices of the United States Supreme Court, and the destruction they are doing to our Constitution. One of the many things he gives insight to is the fiasco of the federal judges in taking over management of a number of schools, and in forced busing trying to integrate blacks and whites. There was never any constitutional authority for such outrages. He covers the history of the  federal courts from beginning to present and outlines a continuum of misbehavior. Dr. Connolly gives an insight into the scams used by judges which they call our Constitution a "living constitution" or an evolving constitution." The impropriety of following prior cases as precedent, or "Stare decisis" is commented on. 

The eight main themes of the book are the following:

■       Article I of the federal Constitution says that only Congress has “legislative power,” the power to pass laws. Article III says that the role of judges is limited to deciding “cases” and “controversies.” It says nothing about allowing judges to make new laws. Article V specifies the only legal process by which our Constitution can be amended. In spite of these mandates, judges make most of the really important new laws. And, ignoring Article V, they amend the Constitution several times each year.

■       It’s been half-a-century since our Supreme Court made a credible pretense of construing the Constitution in accordance with the intent of its framers. That gives rise to a dismaying problem. “We the People” have no say respecting the contents of our Constitution. And those who wrote it had no say in the matter either. Only judges have a say.

■       Over the course of our history, judicial usurpation of lawmaking power has led to a mind-boggling list of national catastrophes. Part of the list appears on the back cover of this book.

■       The practice of following precedents has led to the “evolution” of a quarter-of-a-million-page counterfeit Constitution which judges follow rather than the real one.

■       Our judicial branch of government has stolen a role similar to that of ancient kings and princes. Rogue judges gained despotic power by using methods found in Machiavelli’s The Prince, the same handbook which guided Hitler, Mussolini, and Stalin.

■       In flagrant violation of the First Amendment, federal courts have established a preferred national religion, and restrict our free exercise of our own religions.

■       A gross excess of judicial power has spawned a large and perverse judicial usurpation industry which promotes, protects, and feeds upon it.

■       If our democracy isn’t dead already, it’s on life support. Outlaw judges have corrupted other government institutions by stealing many of their most important functions. That, in turn, is a major cause of voter apathy.

There are some points that Mr. Connolly and I disagree on. For example, he believes that the decision written by Chief Justice John Marshall, in Marbury v. Madison, holding that the Courts could strike down a statute passed by Congress, was wrong. I think it was correct under our Constitution, because I believe that it is a binding document on all three branches of government; and that Congress cannot override or change the Constitution anymore that the Courts can legally do it. The Constitution can only be legally changed by the people and their representatives, with federalist weighting by states, as provided by Article V of the Constitution. But Mr. Connolly and I both agree that the primary problem is rogue judges and justices that substitute their own biased views  for those of the people that actually formed and ratified various provisions of our Constitution, including the Bill of Rights; and the Fourteenth Amendment, and other Civil War amendments. I believe that if enough of the people of this country understood the extent of this usurpation of their rights, they would do something about it. And it could easily be cured by a simple constitutional amendment such as the one I recommend in the article, Saving Our Constitution From Judges, in the Articles section. 

The article, Our Children Reflect Our Culture, has a few things about children that are also in As We Sodomize America. I think one of the most interesting things are statistical comparisons of government studies of disciplinary problems in publics schools in 1940, and then fifty years later in 1990. This gives a keen insight as to what has happened to our culture in fifty years. It also has information showing that the liberal element's argument that our problems today are caused by such things as poverty and guns is not well-founded. Most Criminal violence is not caused by poverty and guns. Of historical interest may be the information about the depression, drought, and Dust Bowl that occurred in the 1930's, in the area where the author lived at that time.

There is nothing more telling about a society than its children. They reflect the influences of their parents and of their schools.  They also reflect a number of other influences, especially today. They have great exposure to the media, in the form of television, and the use many of them make of computers. They are also influenced by their friends, and what "others are doing." Even the stores prey on them and influence them to buy the latest kinds of clothes, and even shoes. 

Liberal Revisionists Present False History and Moral Decay. For a long time this country and other countries have been undergoing continual brainwashing by various liberal groups, including, feminists, homosexualists, and atheists. Their successes have been truly astounding.

"Gay", "homophobia" and the words derived from it, are words made up by the "gay" movement for their propaganda purposes. "Gay" is for the purpose of making sodomy seem less depraved than it is. Homophobic, homophobia and such are to intimidate and deride those who think and say that sodomy is wrong. Let's look at Webster's New Twentieth Century Dictionary of the English Language – Unabridged, 1966. Homophobia, and such derivatives, were not in there at all. As to the word Gay, the first definition was "joyous and lively; merry; happy; lighthearted." The last definition was "wanton; licentious; as, a gay dog." Not one definition meant homosexual, as it is used today. But the media, academia, and the gullible segment of our society dutifully parrot these words, now, just as was intended by the homosexual movement to further its propaganda and thought control. And they find their way into our dictionaries.

These groups have also had great success in revising our dictionaries, history, and even the Bible in furtherance of their programs of brainwashing and thought control.

Words indicating gender and the differences between men and women must be eliminated from our vocabulary. We must realize that sodomy is not wrong, but a commendable activity in which to engage. The atheists and many of the homosexualists want to completely destroy Christianity, and falsely change history to eliminate the place it played in the founding of this country and its institutions. If this cannot be done, the feminists want to destroy the masculine concepts of God and Jesus. Would you believe a new bible containing scripture about Judith Christ; and the "prodigal daughter"?

Our Secular Papacy and Gay Rights, by D. J. Connolly, Ph.D.  This is about some particular misbehavior of judges, and particularly the liberal United States Supreme Court Justices in striking down state laws against acts of homosexual sodomy. This is probably the most flagrant and clear misbehavior that was ever engaged in by certain members of the Supreme Court. It was never intended by our founders that sodomy would be a constitutional right. When this nation became a country, and when our Constitution and Bill of Rights were enacted by the people and their representatives, sodomy was against the common law of all of the states, and most of them had additional statutory provisions against it, including some very severe penalties. When the Fourteenth Amendment was formed and ratified, all but five of the thirty-seven states had statutory laws against sodomy. Mr. Connolly points out that some of them even provided for the death penalty. There was no clearer usurpation of rights of the people by the Court than the Lawrence v. Texas decision striking down all sodomy laws of the states. I explain this situation in detail in my book, As We Sodomize America, except that Lawrence v. Texas had not been decided when it was written. However I predicted what would happen, and the justices who would do it, in that book, because of the erroneous decision of Romer v. Evans. Our United States Supreme Court has truly been a disgrace as all true legal scholars, and thinking people, know. It is something that should be cured, and it easily could be, and judges and justices would still have all of the authority and independence intended by our Founders, and the people who ratified our Constitution and Bill of Rights. 

Powers of the President is a short article on the general presidential powers as provided by our Constitution. There is also information about those powers in regard to current controversies over the powers of surveillance of phone calls between suspected terrorists and people in this country. References are made for more comprehensive information.

Saving Our Constitution From Judges is in some respects a review of the book by the author (O. R. Adams Jr.), A Way to Save Our Constitution From Judges, which will either be available in books stores or on this website at a later time. However, the article itself has considerable information about this serious constitutional problem.

Imperialist judges and imperialist courts lead to corruption in our judiciary. They have no respect for our Constitution. Judicial destruction of our Constitution is being brought about by liberal judges. Judicial corruption is the essence of liberal judges changing the Constitution to their own political and social views. Deplorable actions of our federal courts not only result in destruction to our Constitution by judges, but in doing so they are usurping the rights of the people provided for in the Constitution. This is a terrible misbehavior of judges. It is judicial imperialism.

The primary basis of our Constitution was to bring about a government of the people, by the people and for the people. The liberal and controlling majority members of our United States Supreme Court have worked toward usurping these rights of the people, and to forming a Constitution and government by the judges according to their own particular views. Activist judges are slowly and insidiously destroying our Constitution.

Various areas are covered, such as homosexuality and the courts, religion and the courts, and abortion and the courts. Our Supreme Court itself has adopted the homosexual agenda, thrown out state sodomy laws, and stated that we should respect the engaging in sodomy by homosexuals. Detailed explanations are given as to why this is wrong. Such judicial misbehavior as the federal courts forcing States and schools to bus children around just to try to racially mix them is covered. The federal courts have also exceeded their authority in trying to force the mixing of the races by affirmative action. They have tried to bring about racial quotas in government, schools, colleges, universities, and private business by affirmative action. Discrimination by governments based on race are contrary to our Constitution, and that is what affirmative action and racial quotas are. The article and the book contain information on Thomas Jefferson's view of the judges usurping rights that are not given to them under our Constitution. The parts on Thomas Jefferson and judges shows his distrust and fear of activist judges destroying our Constitution by their usurping rights of the people, the states, and other branches of the government not given the courts by the Constitution. The article covers, and the book in more detail, our founders and our constitution, and their views on how it should be construed by judges. The Constitution should be construed according to the meaning intended by those who formed and adopted it, not according to activist judges. Both the article and the book go into detail on the problems posed by activist judges and our Constitution. Judicial misbehavior is rampant today in many ways. Another aspect of the problem is that it leads to a litigious society.

Many decisions of activist judges are directly contrary to our constitutional rights of freedom of religion and freedom of speech. Christian religious freedom is continually under attack by the ACLU, and that organization is consistently aided by activist judges in its attacks on religion.

The "Fairness Doctrine" is Unconstitutional. This is another article by the editor. Now that the Democrats have recaptured both houses of Congress, they are planning to try to re-enact the old "Fairness Doctrine" that previously proved not only unworkable, but unconstitutional. Their purpose is to try to eliminate the freedom to speak of those who oppose them. Specifically they want to eliminate talk radio programs, such as those of Rush Limbaugh, Michael Savage, and Michael Medved. They have also previously been trying to get a limit on the troops overseas listening to one of their favorite programs, the Rush Limbaugh talk show. Another pain in their side they hope to kill is Christian broadcasting, which this would accomplish. Giving equal sides to opposing views would make talk radio hosts submit half of their programs to those who do not pay for them, and whose views they oppose. And it is not in the nature of a church sermon, to give equal sides to evil or the devil. The left has the same opportunity to get its own programs on the airways as others. They simply want to eliminate views that oppose them -- especially since they have been so effective.

The left has continually worked against freedom of speech and freedom of religion. Their legal hatchet men have been the ACLU. To them speech should be politically correct – that means of course that they should determine what speech should be. They continually work against any semblance of religion in schools or in the public square. The article explains how the ACLU has worked to destroy the Boy Scouts of America, even after the United States Supreme Court decided that they had a right to keep out homosexual scout leaders. The ACLU tries to get schools and public places to bar the Boy Scouts from using places that they have historically been allowed to use.

The ACLU teams up with the pedophile organization, North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA), and represents it in lawsuits. The ACLU works with them to try to get the age of consent lowered so that it will be easier for them to prey on young boys. All of the homosexual groups are continually working for this, and they even have an "Age of Consent" website. The ACLU also works with them and represents them in child pornography cases. All kinds of pornography, including child pornography, is of great interest to these people, and the ACLU. This alone tells us volumes about their true character. One of our present Supreme Court Justices, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, was a former ACLU member, and perhaps still is. She has expressed similar views, including those about lowering the age of consent, and when cases come before the Court, she can be depended upon to hew to the ACLU line.

The article explains why the so-called Fairness Doctrine is unconstitutional. It is a violation of both freedom of speech and freedom of religion protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. As explained, it would indeed be a travesty of justice that The Supreme Court has ruled that virtual child pornography and almost unlimited adult pornography is protected as free speech, but that the right of talk show hosts and religious stations would not have the right to determine the nature of the decent things they have on their programs.

Cone of Evolution. As stated in the March section of the magazine, this article explains the three major fallacies of modern Darwinian theories of evolution. If the theories were true, that life was accidentally formed as a one-celled amoeba and evolved to the uncountable forms of life today in the forms from everything such as germs, bacteria, animals, and plant life, a graph of it would be a cone – beginning from nothing to the untold trillions of forms today. But it just hasn't happened that way. Three of the critical contradictions are:

1. During a comparatively short time in the era known as the Cambrian Explosion, almost all of the animal phyla (families) appeared on earth. The term, explosion, comes about from the suddenness of this appearance of life forms. In fact it appears that there are fewer phyla today than there were then, due to extinction. There is no evidence that this sudden appearance of animal life was in any way due to evolution. Darwin himself recognized this problem, and admitted it was unexplainable (to him).

2. With the cone of evolution, we would be at the top today. With so many forms of life, in spite of the extinction of some, we should have evidence all around us of one species changing into a new species. But it just isn't happening. Not only that, we have had recorded history for several thousand years now, and we have no recorded observations of any such changes – not one. In addition, with all of the paleontological and archeological evidence now available, there is no real evidence of any change of one species to another species. Darwin also recognized this problem (also unexplainable to him).

3. The third problem that cannot be explained by evolution is why humans are the only living things that have developed complex thinking to where they can consider and solve many problems such as these relating to evolution. They paint pictures, compose music, read, write, invent things such as cars, boats, airplanes, computers and various other such things; but they are not the oldest animals. Yet they are the only species that has done any of these things. This cannot be explained by evolutionists.

The above lists three of the major fallacies of Darwinian evolution, but there are of course others. DNA and intelligent design and Genes and intelligent design both present problems for the evolutionists, and I believe that they are insurmountable problems. Both genes and DNA contain information designed for passing on the progeny of the living body containing them. And they both came with that plan from another living body. Other articles on this website also contain further information on Intelligent Design. The theory of evolution has never accounted for the difference between humans and animals (or other animals, if you prefer to call humans animals, too). Human intelligence and evolution has long been a source of controversy, because of the problems related above. Evolution and atheism go together – it might be called the joint religions of those groups.

The theory of evolution is taught as fact in schools. Christianity and evolution as taught in our schools and universities, are not compatible. For that matter, any religion and evolution are not compatible. Evolution and religion are actually two different things. Evolution is a theory and religion is a faith. The origin of life theory, as a part of the theory of evolution, is considered in the article. Christianity and religion embrace creationism based primarily on Genesis. The evolutionary theory of the origin of life, generally is that somehow life accidentally originated in some kind of a "primeval soup" in the form of some kind of a one-celled amoeba. This also presents a contradiction to the intelligent design in nature that is all around us.

There are other articles on evolution and intelligent design that include some of these evolutionary problems, and more such articles are planned for the future.

Evidence of Intelligent Design in Nature. This article covers some of the things about animal and plant life that show intelligent design in nature. Although there are many other things, the intelligent design of several different kinds of plant and animal reproduction systems are covered. Some very intriguing specific examples are covered. Also, the way nature and other animals work together in the reproduction of plant life is considered. The intelligent design of the bases of mathematics are also considered, but not at the length covered in the article on that subject.

The article notes that all astronomy, physics, biology, and other sciences of this nature are studies of our world, its inhabitants, and the universe. They deal with the study of laws of nature and the basic elements of nature, all of which, I believe, contain the same balance, symmetry, and intelligent design as the bases of mathematics.

Intelligent Design Should be Taught in Biology Classes. Intelligent design in nature has been recognized by many, if not all, of the greatest minds since we have had recorded history. There are things in all three of the articles on this. Many current scientists from biologists to physicists recognize this design in nature. Intelligent design is a study of the purposeful design reflected by all plant and animal life, and should therefore be a part of any biology course.

A criticism of the article, "Accepting 'intelligent design' in science classrooms would have disastrous consequences," by Richard Dawkins and Jerry Coyne, is included. The disastrous consequences would be the students learning the truth. Actually, at another time Dawkins had admitted that there is evidence of intelligent design in nature by arguing that it was just the "appearance of having been designed for a purpose." The evolutionists have to know that their claim "it is simply creationism camouflaged with a new name" is patently false. Evidence of intelligent design is not evidence of who the designer was or how many designers there may have been. Whereas, "creationism" implies biblical creation by God. This is something that must be accepted on Faith, and can neither be proved nor disproved.

The Bases of Mathematics Are Intelligently Designed. The bases of mathematics with which this article is concerned are the natural things that mathematics is used to determine, such as power, acceleration, speed, and distance traveled. Also is explained is how even the simplest mathematics such as in arithmetic, like 2 + 2 = 4, and simple multiplication and division, merely reflect actual things in nature. They are facts of nature. 

The article lists a number of the greatest mathematical geniuses in history, including some modern ones, who have recognized intelligent design in nature and attributed it to God, although I consider it merely evidence of intelligent design in nature. Mathematics and intelligent design is a combined field of importance today.

The general recognition of intelligent design in nature and in the universe throughout history is related in the article. Albert Einstein and intelligent design and Thomas Jefferson and intelligent design are referred to in the paper. It is interesting that intelligent design has been recognized by such diverse but great thinkers as these two. Yet the evolutionists still fight the study of the obvious in the classroom. They know that it would sound the death knell of Darwinian evolution theory. Einstein spoke of "the harmony of natural law, which reveals an intelligence of such superiority that, compared with it, all the systematic thinking and acting of human beings is an utterly insignificant reflection."

The Immoral Religions of Atheism and Evolution. This article explains how both Atheism and Evolution, as those ideas are followed and promoted today, have all of the aspects true religions. Also, considered is how they, particularly the atheists and agnostics, misconstrue things to try to make it appear that great people in history followed their views. A particular example given was some of the writing of the late Carl Sagan, an astronomer. 

Modern use of the Term, "Latent Homosexuality." This term was originated long ago by Sigmund Freud, and is defined as conscious or subconscious homosexual urges not acted upon. It is now used as one of the tools by homosexualists to discourage opposition to the homosexual agenda, particularly such opposition as relating the actual depraved acts of sodomy in which they engage. Another purpose of the agenda in the use of the term is a part of the continual effort to falsely convince the public that there are many more homosexuals in our society that there are. This was an aspect of the movement covered more in detail in As We Sodomize America.

The homosexualists also want to eliminate our constitutional freedom of speech, and make criticizing homosexuality a crime. They have been successful in prohibiting such criticism in the media and in our schools in this country. They have been successful in doing this in Canada and in other countries, as laws of the country. In this country they continually work in this direction in trying to get "hate crime" bills passed.

The Pink Swastika and Holocaust Revionist History. This is an article by Judith A. Reisman, Ph.D., in the Articles section. Mrs. Reisman is Founder and President of The Institute for Media Education. She has a very lengthy resume of research, writing, lectures, testifying in court, and is world renowned for the writing and work she has done in behalf of family values and protection of children; and against pedophilia, the homosexual agenda, pornography and child pornography.

Two of Mrs. Reisman's books, Kinsey: Crimes and Consequences, and Kinsey, Sex and Fraud, gained her national acclaim for exposing the fraud of the Kinsey Institute, founded and run By Alfred C. Kinsey. The institute, and Kinsey in particular, appears to have participated in both child pornography and actual sexual misbehavior with small children. This institute also cooperated with and interviewed pedophiles on their criminal sexual misbehavior with children. The research and writings show a sordid sick mind in regard to such things. Billions of government grants were wasted on such trash called research. A number of these things about Kinsey, including his own sexual perversions were covered in As We Sodomize America from other sources as well as from references to Mrs. Reisman's research. Kinsey was also the primary basis for the fiction used by the homosexual movement that 10% of the people were homosexual, whereas valid research indicated the figures to be around 2% or less. Many other writings of Mrs. Reisman are referred to and some are available on her website, which is under The Institute for Media Education in the Organizations section of this website.

In the article, Mrs. Reisman noted that under The Pink Triangle (a Nazi symbol for incarcerated homosexuals) a mass media campaign by the major broadcasters and press, has been awarding Nazi victim status to homosexuals. She shows how the material in the book, The Pink Swastika, refutes this idea; as well as showing the connections between Hitler and the Nazi party and the homosexuals. She refers to how the strategies of the German homosexual movement were to ensconce National Socialism (the Nazi party) and Adolf Hitler, triggering a holocaust which engulfed all of Europe. The author also goes into detail on other authorities and research that confirms the connections between Hitler and the Nazi Party and the homosexuals, and the key members of the Nazi Party that were homosexual. They played a major part in installing Hitler, the policies of the Hitler regime, and the resulting holocaust. She states that "Wilhelm Reich, warned that Nazi leadership was both ideologically and actually homosexual." Also included, is information indicating Hitler's own homosexual perversion. In As We Sodomize America, after considering the information from The Pink Swastika, and other sources, I concluded that Hitler was a homosexual.

Efficient Google Searching and Searches. This article deviates some from the primary mission of this magazine, but is included to help people conduct Google searches in ways that will find the subjects being searched for, with a minimum of material that actually has no relation to the subjects. One of the most simple and helpful things is to put the subject in the Google search box using small (not capital) letters  and in quotation marks. The quotation marks require that only pages that contain that exact phrase be returned. Otherwise, Google will return literally millions of website pages that just happen to contain all of the words, no matter how far apart or how irrelevant to the subject. Single words of course do not need quotation marks, and filters of other words and phrases may be entered with plus (+) signs, and words and phrases not wanted may be sifted out with minus (–) signs. Other search operators are covered, including Boolean operators, which can be very helpful.

Facts, Truth, and Morals are Irrelevant to Democrats. In the campaigns for the 2008 presidential election , it is interesting to see the radical and immoral things come to light that are supported by all of the major Democratic candidates. Some things they try to hide and to sidestep, but a close examination will bring out the truth. It appears that there is no extreme radical and immoral thing in issue that is not supported by the Democrats and their liberal cohorts.

They are pro-abortion, no matter how extreme and how cruel. They even believe in finishing off the killing of babies that have managed to survive abortions and have actually been born and are alive.

They would teach us that the vile and depraved acts of sodomy are an acceptable thing in our society. Although many sidestep the homosexual marriage issue, in public, they actually support it, and all support the recognition of legal unions of those engaging in sodomy.

The Democrats, and their cohort, the ACLU, continually work to promote and protect pornography – even child pornography. They of course are also aided greatly by liberal members of our courts – particularly those on the Untied States Supreme Court. Prior to the successes of the liberal movements, we did not have pornography in our movies, or on television, and it was illegal to send pornography through the mail. Now the movies, television, and the internet are laden with pornographic filth; and we cannot now even completely bar child pornography from the airways.

They support every environmental movement that anyone can dream up, no matter how radical or ill informed, from protecting the silvery minnow in New Mexico, the spotted owl in the Northwest, to their big thing now – Global warming – ignoring all evidence contrary to their views.

In the article, specific things and references are presented on each of these things. One thing covered is how foolish our Governor, Bill Richardson made himself look in his appearance before the homosexual community in Los Angeles the other day.  When asked whether he thought that homosexuality is by choice or biological, he said it was choice, which is probably true. His error was that it does not fit the homosexual agenda. It was his pathetic gyrations when they got after him that make him look so comical.

Something else that I think is interesting, and that informed citizens today should know is data showing that other planets are warming up, and that this could not be caused by anything going on earth. Also, some information is given on the many times in the past that the earth has undergone both ice ages and global warming – much more extreme than anything going on today. None of this was caused by our present day industry and automobiles.

Why Our Founders Feared a Democracy. Our Founders knew well that the demise of prior democracies was brought about primarily by the belief of the people that the government should take care of their various needs and wishes. They have developed a Robin Hood mentality to soak the rich and give to the poor, which eventually destroys the government, and the individual freedoms of the people. While they receive their government benefits, they do not have the will and energy to resist the destruction of their God given Freedoms. Our Founders tried to guard against that very problem, knowing why all prior tries at democracy had miserably failed.

Today, all of the leading Democratic candidates are preying on the desires of the people for healthcare and other benefits. The idea of President John F. Kennedy, "ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country," has now been completely reversed. Apparently the Democratic candidates of today think that the person who can get elected is the person who can promise the most government benefits to the people. This is the exact thing that our Founders feared. It leads to a socialized welfare state, the loss of individual freedom and of individual initiative. It will lead to the demise of America as the great bastion of freedom, and to the end of its status as a world power. It will eventually destroy our form of government, as it has in all past democratic experiments.  

The Following are Hyperlinks to the Books and Articles on this website:

Cone of Evolution